Search results

Journalism we don’t teach at journalism schools

Although basic features of journalism have remained the same over the last decades, the tasks journalists perform, the skills they need and the position they have within news organizations have changed dramatically. Usually the focus in the discourse on changes in journalism is on skills, especially on technical multi-media skills or research skills. In this paper we focus on changes in professional roles of journalists, arguing that these roles have changed fundamentally, leading to a new generation of journalists. We distinguish between different trends in journalism. Journalism has become more technical, ranging from editing video to programming. At the same time, many journalists are now more ‘harvesters’ and ‘managers’ of information and news instead of producers of news. Thirdly, journalists are expected to gather information from citizens and social media, and edit and moderate user-contributions as well. Lastly, many journalists are no longer employed by media but work as freelancers or independent entrepreneurs. We track these trends and provide a detailed description of developments with examples from job descriptions in the Netherlands.

Hyperlocal in de praktijk

Paper voor Politicologenetmaal. Informatievoorziening over lokale politiek was traditioneel de taak van de lokale en regionale media waarbij kranten, huis-aan-huisbladen, lokale - en regionale omroep een belangrijke rol speelden. De rol van deze media wordt langzamerhand kleiner omdat oplagen dalen en de concurrentie van nieuwe digitale media toeneemt. De vraag die in deze bijdrage centraal staat, is welke bijdrage traditionele en nieuwe digitale media leveren aan de informatievoorziening op lokaal (gemeentelijk) niveau. Worden de hoog gespannen verwachtingen op dit terrein daadwerkelijk ingelost? In twee Nederlandse gemeenten in de provincie Utrecht (Leusden en Bunschoten) is deze problematiek getest door alle mediakanalen te inventariseren en gedurende één week de inhoud van deze kanalen te checken op de aanwezigheid van nieuws en informatie die over bestuurlijke politieke aangelegenheden gingen. Uit de resultaten bleek dat er een indrukwekkend aantal print- en audiovisuele media en digitale kanalen aanwezig is in beide plaatsen maar dat veel van deze media geen enkele bijdrage leverden aan de informatievoorziening op politiek gebied. Met name de nieuwe digitale media lieten het afweten, zij bevatten geen nieuws of geen origineel nieuws; hun bijdrage – voor zover aanwezig – beperkte zich tot het doorgeven van nieuws dat elders was verzameld. Ook traditionele media droegen maar matig bij aan de informatievoorziening, er werd sterk geleund op institutionele bronnen zoals gemeente en politieke partijen voor de berichtgeving.

Between hope and fear: Distinctiveness of media accountability online in The Netherlands

News media in The Netherlands show great variety in the extent and ways, in which they realize media accountability online in terms of actor transparency, product transparency and feedback opportunities online. It is suggested that even those news rooms that seem to adhere to transparency and public accountability still need to explore the functionality and application of media accountability instruments (MAI). Both in terms of potentials and pitfalls, news rooms need to consider about what they want to be transparent and in what ways. To the extent that online innovations are visible, traditional news media seem to experiment, as is the case with newsroom blogs or the project of hyper local journalism Dichtbij.nl, part of the Telegraaf Company. Various news media have on-going projects on audience participation, online applications and distribution models. However, since many projects merely aim at finding new applications, processes, platforms and business models, it remains to be seen assess whether projects are indeed reasonably innovative and feasible at the same time. The development of an online and therefore immediate, archived, personalized and interactive context, offers practical and ethical challenges to Dutch journalism. These challenges bring shifts in its role and responsibility to society. It means that changes occur in what journalists are accountable for, as well as ways in how they are accountable. The Dutch media landscape lodges various professional accountability instruments like the press council and both profession-wide and news media specific codes of ethics, but some of these instruments receive only moderate support. Proactive openness is more an exception than the rule and may well be a distinctive indicator for quality journalism. Although news media often acknowledge the importance of media accountability offline and online, they often lack the resources or courage to use them or have different priorities. This ambiguous position may indicate that in relation to media accountability online, Dutch news media are between hope and fear: that it will either improve their relationship with the public and fuel professional quality, or ask too much of resources with too little benefit.

On future journalism, from the viewpoint of the future of events

The Netherlands: Can journalism live with a more demanding public?

Self-regulation in the Netherlands: Journalists opening up to a more demanding public. In: The Trust factor report on self-regulation 2015

Nieuwsvoorzining in de regio. Statistische berekeningen bij hypotheses 1 en 2

Bijlage 7: Statistische berekeningen bij hypothese 1 Statistische SPSS Berekeningen Hypothesen Inwonertal Bijlage 8: Statistische berekeningen bij hypothese 2 Statistische SPSS Berekeningen Hypothesen rol lokale media