Biogas plays an important role in many future renewable energy scenarios as a source of storable and easily extracted form of renewable energy. However, there remains uncertainty as to which sources of biomass can provide a net energy gain while being harvested in a sustainable, ecologically friendly manner. This study will focus on the utilization of common, naturally occurring grass species which are cut during landscape management and typically treated as a waste stream. This waste grass can be valorized through co-digestion with cow manure in a biogas production process. Through the construction of a biogas production model based on the methodology proposed by (Pierie, Moll, van Gemert, & Benders, 2012), a life cycle analysis (LCA) has been performed which determines the impacts and viability of using common grass in a digester to produce biogas. This model performs a material and energy flow analysis (MEFA) on the biogas production process and tracks several system indicators (or impact factors), including the process energy return on energy investment ((P)EROI), the ecological impact (measured in Eco Points), and the global warming potential (GWP, measured in terms of kg of CO2 equivalent). A case study was performed for the village of Hoogkerk in the north-east Netherlands, to determine the viability of producing a portion of the village’s energy requirements by biogas production using biomass waste streams (i.e. common grass and cow manure in a co-digestion process). This study concludes that biogas production from common grass can be an effective and sustainable source of energy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and negative environmental impacts when compared to alternate methods of energy production, such as biogas produced from maize and natural gas production.
This study evaluated the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) in both batch and continuous digesters at 37 °C. Synergistic effects of co-digesting CM and SM at varying volatile solids (VS) ratios (1:0, 0:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3) were observed in the batch experiment, with the most effective degradation of cellulose (56%) and hemicellulose (55%), and thus, the highest cumulative methane yield (210 mL/gVSadded) obtained at a CM:SM ratio of 1:3. Co-digesting CM and SM improved the hydrolysis, as evidenced by the cellulase brought by SM and the increases of cellulolytic bacteria Clostridium. Besides, co-digestion enhanced the acidogenesis and methanogenesis, reflected by the enrichment of syntrophic bacteria Candidatus Cloacimonas and hydrogenotrophic archaea Methanoculleus (Coenzyme-B sulfoethylthiotransferase). When testing continuous digestion, the methane yield increased from 146 mL/gVS/d (CM alone) to 179 mL/gVS/d (CM:SM at 1:1) at a constant organic loading rate (OLR) of 1g VS/L/d and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 25 days. Furthermore, the anaerobic digestion process was enhanced when the daily feed changed back to CM alone, reflected by the improved daily methane yield (159 mL/VS/d). These results provided insights into the improvement of methane production during the anaerobic digestion of animal manure.
LINK
A bioaugmentation approach was used to enhance the performance of anaerobic digestion (AD) using cow manure (CM) as the substrate in a continuous system. To obtain the desirable microbial culture for bioaugmentation, a biochemical methane potential test (BMP) was used to evaluate three commonly used inocula namely (1) municipal solid waste (MSW), (2) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), and (3) cow manure digester (CMMD) for their hydrolytic capacity. The highest lignocellulose removal (56% for cellulose and 50% for hemicellulose) and the most profusion of cellulolytic bacteria were obtained when CM was inoculated with CMMD. CMMD was thus used as the seed inoculum in a continuously operated reactor (Ra) with the fiber fraction of CM as the substrate to further enrich cellulolytic microbes. After 100 days (HRT: 30 days), the Bacteria fraction mainly contained Ruminofilibacter, norank_o_SBR1031, Treponema, Acetivibrio. Surprisingly, the Archaea fraction contained 97% ‘cellulolytic archaea’ norank_c_Bathyarchaeia (Phylum Bathyarchaeota). This enriched consortium was used in the bioaugmentation experiment. A positive effect of bioaugmentation was verified, with a substantial daily methane yield (DMY) enhancement (24.3%) obtained in the bioaugmented reactor (Rb) (179 mL CH4/gVS/d) than that of the control reactor (Rc) (144 mL CH4/gVS/d) (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the effluent of Rb enjoyed an improved cellulose reduction (14.7%) than that of Rc, whereas the amount of hemicellulose remained similar in both reactors' effluent. When bioaugmentation stopped, its influence on the hydrolysis and methanogenesis sustained, reflected by an improved DMY (160 mL CH4/gVS/d) and lower cellulose content (53 mg/g TS) in Rb than those in Rc (DMY 144 mL/CH4/gVS/d and cellulose content 63 mg/g TS, respectively). The increased DMY of the continuous reactor seeded with a specifically enriched consortium able to degrade the fiber fraction in CM shows the feasibility of applying bioaugmentation in AD of CM.
LINK
Circular agriculture is an excellent principle, but much work needs to be done before it can become common practice in the equine sector. In the Netherlands, diversification in this sector is growing, and the professional equine field is facing increasing pressure to demonstrate environmentally sound horse feeding management practices and horse owners are becoming more aware of the need to manage their horses and the land on which they live in a sustainable manner. Horses should be provided with a predominantly fibre-based diet in order to mimic their natural feeding pattern, however grazing impacts pasture differently, with a risk of overgrazing and soil erosion in equine pastures. Additionally, most horses receive supplements not only with concentrates and oils, but also with minerals. Though the excess minerals are excreted in the manure of horses, these minerals can accumulate in the soil or leach to nearby waterways and pollute water resources. Therefore, the postdoc research aims to answer the main question, “What horse feeding practices and measurements are needed to reduce and prevent environmental pollution in the Netherlands?” The postdoc research is composed of two components; a broad survey-based study which will generate quantitative data on horse feeding management and will also obtain qualitative data on the owners’ engagement or willingness of horse owners to act sustainably. Secondly, a field study will involve the collection of detailed data via visits to horse stables in order to gather data for nutritional analysis and to collect fecal samples for mineral analysis. Students, lecturers and partners will actively participate in all phases of the planned research. This postdoc research facilitates learning and intends to develop a footprint calculator for sustainable horse feeding to encompass the complexity of the equine sector, and to improve the Equine Sports and Business curriculum.
