BackgroundSeveral conditions and diseases can result in speech problems that can have a negative impact on everyday functioning, referred to as communicative participation. Subjective problems with acquired speech problems are often assessed with the speech handicap index (SHI). To assess generic participation problems, the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation–Participation (USER-P) questionnaire is frequently used. The English questionnaire Communicative Participation Item Bank—short form (CPIB short form) is a 10-item valid, reliable instrument that assesses communicative participation. In the absence of a Dutch equivalent, translation and validation of the CPIB short form was required.AimsTo translate the CPIB short form into Dutch, and to determine its psychometric properties for the group of adults with speech problems resulting from a neurological aetiology or head and neck cancer.Methods & ProceduresTranslation of the CPIB short form was performed following the instructions of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC). In a cross-sectional multi-centre study, participants completed the Dutch CPIB short form together with the SHI and USER-P, and the CPIB a second time after 2 weeks. We assessed internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CPIB. Construct validity was assessed based on correlations with SHI, USER-P and speech assessments.Outcomes & ResultsIn the validation study, 122 participants were included: 51 with dysarthria due to different neurological disorders, 48 with speech problems due to head and neck cancer treatment and 23 healthy controls. Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.962), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test–retest reliability was high 0.908 (95% CI = 0.870–0.935). Construct validity was supported by a strong correlation between the Dutch CPIB short form and the SHI total score (SHI total rs = 0.887) and a moderate correlation between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the USER-P subscales (USER-P Frequency rs = 0.365; USER-P restrictions and USER-P satisfaction rs = 0.546). A moderate correlation was found between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the speech performance assessments (degree of distortedness r = −0.0557; p ≤ 0.001; degree of intelligibility r = 0.0562).Conclusions & ImplicationsThe Dutch CPIB short form provides a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice and research purposes. It allows clinicians to start using this PROM in clinical and research practice to systematically investigate the impact of the speech problems on communicative participation in a Dutch-speaking population.What this paper addsWhat is already known on the subjectCommunicative participation allows people to take part in life situations, but can be affected by acquired speech problems. The CPIB is a patient-reported outcome measure for the assessment of this concept. For the English language the 46-item bank and a 10-item short form is available.What this paper adds to existing knowledgeThis paper describes the process of translation of the CPIB short form into Dutch, and confirms its reproducibility and validity.What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?With this validated Dutch version of the CPIB short form available, professionals can implement this tool in clinical and research practice to systematically evaluate communicative participation.
Background Variations in communicative participation of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) cannot be wholly explained by their language difficulties alone and may be influenced by contextual factors. Contextual factors may support or hinder communicative participation in children, which makes their identification clinically relevant. Aims To investigate which contextual (environmental and personal) factors in early childhood are protective, risk or neutral factors for communicative participation among school-aged children with DLD, and to identify possible gaps in knowledge about this subject. Methods & Procedures A scoping review was conducted based on a systematic search of studies published from January 2007 to March 2022 in Pubmed, Embase (without MEDLINE), CINAHL and PsycINFO. In total, 8802 studies were reviewed using predefined eligibility criteria, of which 32 studies were included for data extraction and critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2021) tools. Main Contribution The methodological quality of included studies was adequate to strong. Personal protective factors identified are being a preschool girl, reaching school age and being prosocial, while personal risk factors are becoming a teenager or adolescent, having low socio-cognitive skills and experiencing comorbid mobility impairment or behavioural problems. Gender after the preschool years and non-verbal abilities were not found to be of influence, and the role of socio-emotional skills is inconclusive. Receiving therapy is an environmental protective factor, while the association between socio-economical family characteristics with communicative participation is inconclusive. Conclusions & Implications Limited research has been conducted on which risk and protective factors present in early childhood are associated with later communicative participation of children with DLD. The influence of co-occurring health conditions, social background variables, individual psychological assets, interpersonal relationships and attitudes of other people represent knowledge gaps. In addition, knowledge about the comparative effectiveness of different types of interventions and service delivery models, and the impact of administrative control, organizational mechanisms and standards established by governments on children's communicative participation is lacking. More longitudinal research is needed focusing on the identification of relevant personal and environmental factors and the interactions between them in relation to communicative participation outcomes.
LINK
Purpose:Our aim was to develop consensus on the definition and operationalization of communicative participation (CP)in 2- to 8-year-old children with language disorders (LDs).A clear definition and operationalization can facilitate the discussion about children’s communication problems in daily life between parents and professionals. Method: In an online Delphi study, anonymized thoughts and opinions were collected on the definition and operationalization of CP in young children with LD. The 47 Delphi panel members were Dutch parents, young adults with LDs, teachers and assistants, speech-language pathologists, clinical linguists,and clinical researchers. Thematic content analysis was used to develop a concept definition and items operationalizing CP.The Delphi panel rated the suitability of concept definitions using a 7-point Likert scale. Concept definitions were revised with feedback from the Delphi panel until consensus was achieved. The Delphi panel rated items on how well they operationalize CP, using the same Likert scale. Results: The majority (79%) of the Delphi panel indicated that the essence of CP was captured by the definition:“CP is understanding and being understood in a social context,by applying verbal and non-verbal communication skills.”In addition, 33 behavioral items were developed.Conclusion:This study resulted in strong consensus on the definition of CP between Dutch parents and professionals.Items were developed that can inform speech-language pathologists on the type of questions to ask a child’s parents or teacher when discussing CP. Further research is needed on how the items can best be used in clinical practice.
LINK
aphasia, speech apraxia, blended careDeze aanvraag is onderdeel van een structureel samenwerkingsverband van het UMCG Centrum voor Revalidatie met de Hanzehogeschool, afdeling Logopedie en de RUG, afdeling Taalwetenschappen, University College of Groningen en Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent. Het project heeft ten doel het verbeteren van de kwaliteit van de logopedische behandeling van spraak- en taalstoornissen na hersenletsel. Hierbij staat telkens het verbinden van theoretische inzichten uit de literatuur met klinisch opgedane inzichten voorop.
Bij afasie is spreken en begrijpen van taal lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de patiënt. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een meetinstrument gericht op communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie.Doel Er zijn in Nederland geen bruikbare instrumenten om communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie in kaart te brengen. Dit onderzoek heeft tot doel om zo'n instrument te ontwikkelen. We vertalen een itembank gericht op de communicatieve participatie bij mensen met afasie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel (NAH) en we ontwikkelen deze tot een betrouwbaar en valide meetinstrument. Resultaten Dit onderzoek loopt nog. Na afloop vind je hier de resultaten. Looptijd 01 september 2019 - 31 augustus 2023 Aanpak We vertalen de Communicative Participation Item Bank en ontwikkelen deze door. We gebruiken daarbij de methodologie van het internationale meetsysteem voor patiëntuitkomsten PROMIS. We maken de itembank afasievriendelijk op basis van criteria uit de literatuur. We onderzoeken alle klinimetrische meeteigenschappen volgens de COSMIN-methodologie.
Bij afasie is spreken en begrijpen van taal lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de patiënt. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een meetinstrument gericht op communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie.Doel Er zijn in Nederland geen bruikbare instrumenten om communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie in kaart te brengen. Dit onderzoek heeft tot doel om zo'n instrument te ontwikkelen. We vertalen een itembank gericht op de communicatieve participatie bij mensen met afasie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel (NAH) en we ontwikkelen deze tot een betrouwbaar en valide meetinstrument. Resultaten Dit onderzoek loopt nog. Na afloop vind je hier de resultaten. Looptijd 01 september 2019 - 31 augustus 2023 Aanpak We vertalen de Communicative Participation Item Bank en ontwikkelen deze door. We gebruiken daarbij de methodologie van het internationale meetsysteem voor patiëntuitkomsten PROMIS. We maken de itembank afasievriendelijk op basis van criteria uit de literatuur. We onderzoeken alle klinimetrische meeteigenschappen volgens de COSMIN-methodologie.
