Service of SURF
© 2025 SURF
Background:Current technology innovations, such as wearables, have caused surprising reactions and feelings of deep connection to devices. Some researchers are calling mobile and wearable technologies cognitive prostheses, which are intrinsically connected to individuals as if they are part of the body, similar to a physical prosthesis. Additionally, while several studies have been performed on the phenomenology of receiving and wearing a physical prosthesis, it is unknown whether similar subjective experiences arise with technology.Objective:In one of the first qualitative studies to track wearables in a longitudinal investigation, we explore whether a wearable can be embodied similar to a physical prosthesis. We hoped to gain insights and compare the phases of embodiment (ie, initial adjustment to the prosthesis) and the psychological responses (ie, accept the prosthesis as part of their body) between wearables and limb prostheses. This approach allowed us to find out whether this pattern was part of a cyclical (ie, period of different usage intensity) or asymptotic (ie, abandonment of the technology) pattern.Methods:We adapted a limb prosthesis methodological framework to be applied to wearables and conducted semistructured interviews over a span of several months to assess if, how, and to what extent individuals come to embody wearables similar to prosthetic devices. Twelve individuals wore fitness trackers for 9 months, during which time interviews were conducted in the following three phases: after 3 months, after 6 months, and at the end of the study after 9 months. A deductive thematic analysis based on Murray’s work was combined with an inductive approach in which new themes were discovered.Results:Overall, the individuals experienced technology embodiment similar to limb embodiment in terms of adjustment, wearability, awareness, and body extension. Furthermore, we discovered two additional themes of engagement/reengagement and comparison to another device or person. Interestingly, many participants experienced a rarely reported phenomenon in longitudinal studies where the feedback from the device was counterintuitive to their own beliefs. This created a blurring of self-perception and a dilemma of “whom” to believe, the machine or one’s self.Conclusions:There are many similarities between the embodiment of a limb prosthesis and a wearable. The large overlap between limb and wearable embodiment would suggest that insights from physical prostheses can be applied to wearables and vice versa. This is especially interesting as we are seeing the traditionally “dumb” body prosthesis becoming smarter and thus a natural merging of technology and body. Future longitudinal studies could focus on the dilemma people might experience of whether to believe the information of the device over their own thoughts and feelings. These studies might take into account constructs, such as technology reliance, autonomy, and levels of self-awareness.
The influence of the built environment on travel behaviour and the role of intervening variables such as socio-demographics and travel-related attitudes have long been debated in the literature. To date, most empirical studies have applied cross-sectional designs to investigate their bidirectional relationships. However, these designs provide limited evidence for causality. This study represents one of the first attempts to employ a longitudinal design on these relationships. We applied cross lagged panel structural equation models to a two-wave longitudinal dataset to assess the directions and strengths of the relationships between the built environment, travel behaviour and travel-related attitudes. Results show that the residential built environment has a small but significant influence on car use and travel attitudes. In addition, the built environment influenced travel-related attitudes indicating that people tend to adjust their attitudes to their built environment. This provides some support for land use policies that aim to influence travel behaviour.
LINK
Adolescenten brengen steeds meer vrije tijd door met het spelen van games en bevinden zich mede daardoor in een hybride leefwereld. Deze relatief nieuwe wereld brengt nieuwe uitdagingen mee rondom identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn; voor gamende adolescenten zelf, maar ook hun (professionele) opvoeders. Wij onderzoeken de relatie tussen gamen, identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn en de rol die (professionele) opvoeders hierin hebben.Doel Op dit moment ontbreekt kennis over de relatie tussen gamen, identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn van adolescenten en is het onder andere lastig om handvatten voor (professionele) opvoeders te ontwikkelen. Handvatten kunnen helpen om beter aan te sluiten bij de leefwereld en behoeftes van gamende adolescenten. De resultaten van dit onderzoek kunnen bijdragen aan een positieve (sociale) identiteitsontwikkeling van gamende adolescenten in een hybride wereld. Resultaten Het promotieonderzoek gaat verschillende wetenschappelijke publicaties opleveren. We vertalen onze resultaten samen met professionals, opvoeders en adolescenten naar praktische handvatten voor (professionele) opvoeders. De betrokken praktijkpartners en opleidingen geven deze wetenschappelijk onderbouwde inzichten en handvatten een passende plaats in hun curricula en werkwijzen. Looptijd 01 september 2022 - 01 september 2026 Aanpak Dit promotieonderzoek heeft een praktijkgericht, mixed-methods design. Voor de kwantitatieve analyse maken we gebruik van longitudinale data van het Digital Youth project van Universiteit Utrecht. De kwalitatieve data wordt verzameld door symbolic netnography (een digitale variant van etnografisch onderzoek), interviews en participerende observaties met adolescenten en (professionele) opvoeders. In samenspraak met adolescenten en (professionele) opvoeders worden deze inzichten vertaald naar praktische handvatten.
Adolescenten brengen steeds meer vrije tijd door met het spelen van games en bevinden zich mede daardoor in een hybride leefwereld. Deze relatief nieuwe wereld brengt nieuwe uitdagingen mee rondom identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn; voor gamende adolescenten zelf, maar ook hun (professionele) opvoeders. Wij onderzoeken de relatie tussen gamen, identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn en de rol die (professionele) opvoeders hierin hebben.Doel Op dit moment ontbreekt kennis over de relatie tussen gamen, identiteitsontwikkeling en psychosociaal welzijn van adolescenten en is het onder andere lastig om handvatten voor (professionele) opvoeders te ontwikkelen. Handvatten kunnen helpen om beter aan te sluiten bij de leefwereld en behoeftes van gamende adolescenten. De resultaten van dit onderzoek kunnen bijdragen aan een positieve (sociale) identiteitsontwikkeling van gamende adolescenten in een hybride wereld. Resultaten Het promotieonderzoek gaat verschillende wetenschappelijke publicaties opleveren. We vertalen onze resultaten samen met professionals, opvoeders en adolescenten naar praktische handvatten voor (professionele) opvoeders. De betrokken praktijkpartners en opleidingen geven deze wetenschappelijk onderbouwde inzichten en handvatten een passende plaats in hun curricula en werkwijzen. Looptijd 01 september 2022 - 01 september 2026 Aanpak Dit promotieonderzoek heeft een praktijkgericht, mixed-methods design. Voor de kwantitatieve analyse maken we gebruik van longitudinale data van het Digital Youth project van Universiteit Utrecht. De kwalitatieve data wordt verzameld door symbolic netnography (een digitale variant van etnografisch onderzoek), interviews en participerende observaties met adolescenten en (professionele) opvoeders. In samenspraak met adolescenten en (professionele) opvoeders worden deze inzichten vertaald naar praktische handvatten.
Physical rehabilitation programs revolve around the repetitive execution of exercises since it has been proven to lead to better rehabilitation results. Although beginning the motor (re)learning process early is paramount to obtain good recovery outcomes, patients do not normally see/experience any short-term improvement, which has a toll on their motivation. Therefore, patients find it difficult to stay engaged in seemingly mundane exercises, not only in terms of adhering to the rehabilitation program, but also in terms of proper execution of the movements. One way in which this motivation problem has been tackled is to employ games in the rehabilitation process. These games are designed to reward patients for performing the exercises correctly or regularly. The rewards can take many forms, for instance providing an experience that is engaging (fun), one that is aesthetically pleasing (appealing visual and aural feedback), or one that employs gamification elements such as points, badges, or achievements. However, even though some of these serious game systems are designed together with physiotherapists and with the patients’ needs in mind, many of them end up not being used consistently during physical rehabilitation past the first few sessions (i.e. novelty effect). Thus, in this project, we aim to 1) Identify, by means of literature reviews, focus groups, and interviews with the involved stakeholders, why this is happening, 2) Develop a set of guidelines for the successful deployment of serious games for rehabilitation, and 3) Develop an initial implementation process and ideas for potential serious games. In a follow-up application, we intend to build on this knowledge and apply it in the design of a (set of) serious game for rehabilitation to be deployed at one of the partners centers and conduct a longitudinal evaluation to measure the success of the application of the deployment guidelines.