Dienst van SURF
© 2025 SURF
A re-experiencing of the wilderness ideal is taking place in the Netherlands. This is expressed in the attention that is being devoted to projects in which agricultural land is transformed into nature. One of these projects is central to this article: the island Tiengemeten. We aim to study the experiences of visitors to this project in order to gain insight into the extent to which there are layers of depth visible in these experiences. For a lot of respondents going into in nature in general and making a visit to an island such as Tiengemeten in particular are ways of escaping from their day-to-day existence. It is noticeable that the words and images that the visitors use to describe their experiences fit in mainly with the wilderness view of nature. The wilderness view of nature is connected with experiences of the sublime; so in this article we also ask the question as to what the shift to the wilderness view of nature means for the religious landscape of the Netherlands.
Mensen uit wijken met een lage sociaaleconomische status (SES) zijn moeilijk te bereiken voor natuuractiviteiten. Samenwerking met welzijnsorganisaties blijkt een succesfactor bij het betrekken van bewoners van lage "SES-wijken". Deze organisaties hebben al een goed netwerk onder deze mensen. Het komt er wel op aan om deze samenwerking een vervolg te geven. Een van de projecten die probeert hier wat aan te doen is Natuur om de Hoek. Dit is eensamenwerkingsverband dat Naturalis heeft opgezet met lokale partners in enkele lage SES-wijken in Leiden en Katwijk.
MULTIFILE
Based on in-depth interviews, this article presents findings of a study centred on public communication regarding Tiengemeten, a Dutch island previously occupied by farmers. An answer is sought to the question of how visitors to Tiengemeten evaluate, according to their own experiences, the discourse of people involved in Tiengemeten from a policy and communication perspective. This study showed that visitors’ experiences do not always match the emotions appealed to in public communication materials. It is also suggested that people involved from a policy and communication perspective should refrain from using ‘heavily value-laden’ phraseology. For reasons of trust, this article suggests aligning public communication with genuine experiences of visitors. This is also necessary for avoiding scepticism of visitors as policy makers and communication professionals run a risk that public communication regarding nature becomes counterproductive.