Objective: To describe the development of a goal-directed movement intervention in two medical wards, including recommendations for implementation and evaluation. Design: Implementation Research. Setting: Pulmonology and nephrology/gastroenterology wards of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Participants: Seven focus groups were executed including 28 nurses, 7 physical therapists and 15 medical specialists. Patients' perceptions were repeatedly assessed during the iterative steps of the intervention development. Intervention: Interventions were targeted to each ward's specific character, following an Intervention Mapping approach using literature and research meetings. Main measures: Intervention components were linked to Behavior Change Techniques and implementation strategies will be selected using the Expert Recommendation Implementing Change tool. Evaluation outcomes like number of patients using the movement intervention will be measured, based on the taxonomy of Proctor. Results: The developed intervention consists of: insight in patients movement behavior (monitoring & feedback), goal setting (goals & planning) and adjustments to the environment (associations & antecedents). The following implementation strategies are recommended: to conduct educational meetings, prepare & identify champions and audit & provide feedback. To measure service and client outcomes, the mean level of physical activity per ward can be evaluated and the Net Promoter Score can be used. Conclusion(s): This study shows the development of a goal-directed movement intervention aligned with the needs of healthcare professionals. This resulted in an intervention consisting of feedback & monitoring of movement behavior, goal setting and adjustments in the environment. Using a step-by-step iterative implementation model to guide development and implementation is recommended.
Objective: To describe the development of a goal-directed movement intervention in two medical wards, including recommendations for implementation and evaluation. Design: Implementation Research. Setting: Pulmonology and nephrology/gastroenterology wards of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Participants: Seven focus groups were executed including 28 nurses, 7 physical therapists and 15 medical specialists. Patients' perceptions were repeatedly assessed during the iterative steps of the intervention development. Intervention: Interventions were targeted to each ward's specific character, following an Intervention Mapping approach using literature and research meetings. Main measures: Intervention components were linked to Behavior Change Techniques and implementation strategies will be selected using the Expert Recommendation Implementing Change tool. Evaluation outcomes like number of patients using the movement intervention will be measured, based on the taxonomy of Proctor. Results: The developed intervention consists of: insight in patients movement behavior (monitoring & feedback), goal setting (goals & planning) and adjustments to the environment (associations & antecedents). The following implementation strategies are recommended: to conduct educational meetings, prepare & identify champions and audit & provide feedback. To measure service and client outcomes, the mean level of physical activity per ward can be evaluated and the Net Promoter Score can be used. Conclusion(s): This study shows the development of a goal-directed movement intervention aligned with the needs of healthcare professionals. This resulted in an intervention consisting of feedback & monitoring of movement behavior, goal setting and adjustments in the environment. Using a step-by-step iterative implementation model to guide development and implementation is recommended.
BACKGROUND: Combining increased dietary protein intake and resistance exercise training for elderly people is a promising strategy to prevent or counteract the loss of muscle mass and decrease the risk of disabilities. Using findings from controlled interventions in a real-life setting requires adaptations to the intervention and working procedures of healthcare professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study is to adapt an efficacious intervention for elderly people to a real-life setting (phase one) and test the feasibility and potential impact of this prototype intervention in practice in a pilot study (phase two).METHODS: The Intervention Mapping approach was used to guide the adaptation in phase one. Qualitative data were collected from the original researchers, target group, and HCPs, and information was used to decide whether and how specified intervention elements needed to be adapted. In phase two, a one-group pre-test post-test pilot study was conducted (n = 25 community-dwelling elderly), to elicit further improvements to the prototype intervention. The evaluation included participant questionnaires and measurements at baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1), registration forms, interviews, and focus group discussions (T1). Qualitative data for both phases were analysed using an inductive approach. Outcome measures included physical functioning, strength, body composition, and dietary intake. Change in outcomes was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.RESULTS: The most important adaptations to the original intervention were the design of HCP training and extending the original protein supplementation with a broader nutrition programme aimed at increasing protein intake, facilitated by a dietician. Although the prototype intervention was appreciated by participants and professionals, and perceived applicable for implementation, the pilot study process evaluation resulted in further adaptations, mostly concerning recruitment, training session guidance, and the nutrition programme. Pilot study outcome measures showed significant improvements in muscle strength and functioning, but no change in lean body mass.CONCLUSION: The combined nutrition and exercise intervention was successfully adapted to the real-life setting and seems to have included the most important effective intervention elements. After adaptation of the intervention using insights from the pilot study, a larger, controlled trial should be conducted to assess cost-effectiveness.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NL51834.081.14 (April 22, 2015).
Het probleem dat deze projectaanvraag adresseert is de hoge werkdruk van zorgprofessionals in de dementiezorg. Door een stijging in het aantal ouderen met dementie, stijgt de zorgvraag, terwijl het tekort aan zorgprofessionals groeit. Door de inzet van slimme technologische innovaties zoals een Intelligente Zorgomgeving kan deze werkdruk sterk verminderd worden. Een Intelligente Zorgomgeving maakt gebruik van sensortechnieken en gebruikt Artificiële Intelligentie (AI) om gepersonaliseerde zorg te leveren door de zorgbehoefte in kaart te brengen en daarop te reageren. De Intelligente Zorgomgeving werkt daarbij samen met de zorgprofessional. Deze oplossingsrichting wordt in dit project verder uitgewerkt samen met vier zorgpartijen en drie innovatieve MKB. Aan de hand van de casus “Ondersteuning bij eten en drinken” worden Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAI) ontwikkeld zodat de zorgprofessional de zorgprofessional ondersteund wordt in het uitvoeren van bepaalde zorgtaken. Een voorbeeld van een interventie is het op het juiste moment geven van op de persoon aangepaste zintuigelijke prikkels (geluiden, lichten en projecties) die senioren stimuleren om te eten. Door dergelijke interventies wordt de druk op de zorgprofessional verminderd en neemt de kwaliteit van de zorg toe. Niet alleen de integratie van de AI-modules is van belang maar ook hoe de AI ‘getoond’ wordt aan de zorgprofessional. Daarom wordt er in dit project ook extra aandacht besteed aan de interactie tussen zorgprofessional en de Intelligente Zorgomgeving waardoor het gebruiksgemak wordt verhoogd en zowel cliënt als zorgprofessional een hogere mate van autonomie kunnen ervaren. Door het prototype van de Intelligente Zorgomgeving verder te ontwikkelen in zorginstellingen in samenwerking met verschillende zorgprofessionals en aandacht te besteden aan het ontwikkelen van AI en Interactie met het systeem kunnen de wensen en behoeften van de zorgprofessionals worden geïntegreerd in de Intelligente Zorgomgeving. Dit gebeurt in drie iteraties waarbij de drie opeenvolgende beschikbare living labs in toenemende mate complex en realistisch zijn.