Developers of charging infrastructure, be it public or private parties, are highly dependent on accurate utilization data in order to make informed decisions where and when to expand charging points. The Amsterdam The Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences in close cooperation with the municipalities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht and the metropolitan region of Amsterdam developed both the back- and front-end of a decision support tool. This paper describes the design of the decision support tool and its DataWareHouse architecture. The back-end is based on a monthly update of charging data with Charge point Detail Records and Meter Values enriched with location specific data. The design of the front-end is based on Key Performance Indicators used in the decision process for charging infrastructure roll-out. Implementing this design and DataWareHouse architecture allows all kinds of EV related companies and cities to start monitoring their charging infrastructure. It provides an overview of how the most important KPIs are being monitored and represented in the decision support tool based on regular interviews and decision processes followed by four major cities and a metropolitan region in the Netherlands.
Companies are organised to fulfil two distinctive functions: efficient and resilient exploitation of current business and parallel exploration of new possibilities. For the latter, companies require strong organisational infrastructure such as team compositions and functional structures to ensure exploration remains effective. This paper explores the potential for designing organisational infrastructure to be part of fourth order subject matter. In particular, it explores how organisational infrastructure could be designed in the context of an exploratory unit, operating in a large heritage airline. This paper leverages insights from a long-term action research project and finds that building trust and shared frames are crucial to designing infrastructure that affords the greater explorative agenda of an organisation. https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.07.227 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/christine-de-lille-8039372/
MULTIFILE
Since 2012 the dutch metropolitan area (the metropole region of amsterdam, the city of amsterdam, rotterdam, the hague, utrecht ) cooperate in finding the best way to stimulate electric mobility through the implementation of a public charging infrastructure. with more than 5600 charge points and 1.6 million charge sessions in the last two years this is one of the most extensively used public charging infrastructure available worldwide. in this paper a benchmark study is carried out to identify different charge patterns between these 5 leading areas with an extensive public charging infrastructure to establish whether and how charge behaviour (e.g. charged volume, capacity utilization, unique users) differs between cities. based on the results first explanations for possible differences in charge patterns between cities will be provided. the study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the utilization of public charging infrastructure in a metropolitan area existing of four city centres and the amsterdam metropolitan area and to provide input for policy makers to prepare a public charging infrastructure ready for the projected growth of electric mobility in the next five years.
The focus of this project is on improving the resilience of hospitality Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) by enabling them to take advantage of digitalization tools and data analytics in particular. Hospitality SMEs play an important role in their local community but are vulnerable to shifts in demand. Due to a lack of resources (time, finance, and sometimes knowledge), they do not have sufficient access to data analytics tools that are typically available to larger organizations. The purpose of this project is therefore to develop a prototype infrastructure or ecosystem showcasing how Dutch hospitality SMEs can develop their data analytic capability in such a way that they increase their resilience to shifts in demand. The one year exploration period will be used to assess the feasibility of such an infrastructure and will address technological aspects (e.g. kind of technological platform), process aspects (e.g. prerequisites for collaboration such as confidentiality and safety of data), knowledge aspects (e.g. what knowledge of data analytics do SMEs need and through what medium), and organizational aspects (what kind of cooperation form is necessary and how should it be financed).
Digital transformation has been recognized for its potential to contribute to sustainability goals. It requires companies to develop their Data Analytic Capability (DAC), defined as their ability to collect, manage and analyze data effectively. Despite the governmental efforts to promote digitalization, there seems to be a knowledge gap on how to proceed, with 37% of Dutch SMEs reporting a lack of knowledge, and 33% reporting a lack of support in developing DAC. Participants in the interviews that we organized preparing this proposal indicated a need for guidance on how to develop DAC within their organization given their unique context (e.g. age and experience of the workforce, presence of legacy systems, high daily workload, lack of knowledge of digitalization). While a lot of attention has been given to the technological aspects of DAC, the people, process, and organizational culture aspects are as important, requiring a comprehensive approach and thus a bundling of knowledge from different expertise. Therefore, the objective of this KIEM proposal is to identify organizational enablers and inhibitors of DAC through a series of interviews and case studies, and use these to formulate a preliminary roadmap to DAC. From a structure perspective, the objective of the KIEM proposal will be to explore and solidify the partnership between Breda University of Applied Sciences (BUas), Avans University of Applied Sciences (Avans), Logistics Community Brabant (LCB), van Berkel Logistics BV, Smink Group BV, and iValueImprovement BV. This partnership will be used to develop the preliminary roadmap and pre-test it using action methodology. The action research protocol and preliminary roadmap thereby developed in this KIEM project will form the basis for a subsequent RAAK proposal.
Snelheid is één van de belangrijkste basisrisicofactoren in het verkeer. Hoe sneller er gereden wordt in een auto hoe groter de kans op (zware) ongevallen2 en hoe hoger de uitstoot. Veel verkeersveiligheidsbeleid spitst zich daarom toe op het voorkomen van te hoge snelheden en het voorkomen van te grote snelheidsverschillen. ISA, Intelligente Snelheid Adaptatie, is een van de technologische oplossingen die kan bijdragen aan het voorkomen van te hoge snelheden in auto’s. ISA kent vele verschijningsvormen, van informerend (via slimme technologie wordt de bestuurder geïnformeerd over de geldende maximumsnelheid) tot dwingend (de auto wordt fysiek beperkt om harder te rijden dan de maximumsnelheid). Inmiddels bestaat voldoende bewijs dat de acceptatiegraad van ISA hoog kan zijn, wanneer het systeem perfect werkt. De praktijk is echter weerbarstig, doordat systemen (soms) technisch kunnen falen of onvoldoende correcte informatie doorgeven aan de bestuurder. Dit staat de acceptatie van ISA in de weg; niet in de laatste plaats omdat onderzoek heeft aangetoond dat bestuurders hogere normen hanteren voor het accepteren van technisch falen in zelfrijdende voertuigen5. Een (rijtaakondersteunend)systeem moet ten alle tijden beter functioneren dan de mens. In ACTI-I wordt dit spanningsveld onderzocht. De vraag luidt: Welke impact heeft technisch falen op de acceptatie van ISA? Deze vraag wordt beantwoord middels 1) literatuuronderzoek naar falen en acceptatie van technologische systemen; 2) rijsimulator/deelnemersonderzoek naar de waardering voor ISA en of, en zo ja hoe, de waardering verandert al naar gelang het falen van het systeem toeneemt. We werken hiervoor samen met drie MKB’s die ISA systemen ontwikkelen en verkopen aan particulieren en de overheid. De resultaten van ACTI-I zullen worden gepubliceerd en vormen de basis voor een RAAK-MKB onderzoek naar de relatie tussen technisch falen en de bestuurdersacceptatie van ISA en andere geavanceerde rijhulpsystemen
