Innovation is crucial for higher education to ensure high-quality curricula that address the changing needs of students, labor markets, and society as a whole. Substantial amounts of resources and enthusiasm are devoted to innovations, but often they do not yield the desired changes. This may be due to unworkable goals, too much complexity, and a lack of resources to institutionalize the innovation. In many cases, innovations end up being less sustainable than expected or hoped for. In the long term, the disappointing revenues of innovations hamper the ability of higher education to remain future proof. Against the background of this need to increase the success of educational innovations, our colleague Klaartje van Genugten has explored the literature on innovations to reveal mechanisms that contribute to the sustainability of innovations. Her findings are synthesized in this report. They are particularly meaningful for directors of education programs, curriculum committees, educational consultants, and policy makers, who are generally in charge of defining the scope and set up of innovations. Her report offers a comprehensive view and provides food for thought on how we can strive for future-proof and sustainable innovations. I therefore recommend reading this report.
Currently, various higher education (HE) institutes develop flexible curricula for various reasons, including promoting accessibility of HE, the societal need for more self-regulated professionals who engage in life-long learning, and the desire to increase motivation of students. Increasing flexibility in curricula allows students to choose for example what they learn, when they learn, how they learn, where they learn, and/or with whom. However, HE institutes raise the question of what preferences and needs different stakeholders have with regard to flexibility, so that suitable choices can be made in the design of policies, curricula, and student support programs. In this workshop, we focus on student preferences and share recent insights from research on HE students' preferences regarding flexible education. Moreover, we use participants’ expertise to identify new (research) questions to further explore what students’ needs imply for several domains, namely curriculum-design, student support that is provided by educators/staff, policy, management, and the professional field. Firstly, a conceptual framework on flexible education and student’s preferences will be presented. Secondly, participants reflect in groups on student personas. Then, discussion groups have a Delphi-based discussion to collect new ideas for research. Finally, participants share the outcomes on a ‘willing wall’ and a ‘wailing wall’.
MULTIFILE
Over the last two decades, institutions for higher education such as universities and colleges have rapidly expanded and as a result have experienced profound changes in processes of research and organization. However, the rapid expansion and change has fuelled concerns about issues such as educators' technology professional development. Despite the educational value of emerging technologies in schools, the introduction has not yet enjoyed much success. Effective use of information and communication technologies requires a substantial change in pedagogical practice. Traditional training and learning approaches cannot cope with the rising demand on educators to make use of innovative technologies in their teaching. As a result, educational institutions as well as the public are more and more aware of the need for adequate technology professional development. The focus of this paper is to look at action research as a qualitative research methodology for studying technology professional development in HE in order to improve teaching and learning with ICTs at the tertiary level. The data discussed in this paper have been drawn from a cross institutional setting at Fontys University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands. The data were collected and analysed according to a qualitative approach.
Students in Higher Music Education (HME) are not facilitated to develop both their artistic and academic musical competences. Conservatoires (professional education, or ‘HBO’) traditionally foster the development of musical craftsmanship, while university musicology departments (academic education, or ‘WO’) promote broader perspectives on music’s place in society. All the while, music professionals are increasingly required to combine musical and scholarly knowledge. Indeed, musicianship is more than performance, and musicology more than reflection—a robust musical practice requires people who are versed in both domains. It’s time our education mirrors this blended profession. This proposal entails collaborative projects between a conservatory and a university in two cities where musical performance and musicology equally thrive: Amsterdam (Conservatory and University of Amsterdam) and Utrecht (HKU Utrechts Conservatorium and Utrecht University). Each project will pilot a joint program of study, combining existing modules with newly developed ones. The feasibility of joint degrees will be explored: a combined bachelor’s degree in Amsterdam; and a combined master’s degree in Utrecht. The full innovation process will be translated to a transferable infrastructural model. For 125 students it will fuse praxis-based musical knowledge and skills, practice-led research and academic training. Beyond this, the partners will also use the Comenius funds as a springboard for collaboration between the two cities to enrich their respective BA and MA programs. In the end, the programme will diversify the educational possibilities for students of music in the Netherlands, and thereby increase their professional opportunities in today’s job market.
Om tegemoet te komen aan de eisen die gesteld worden aan werknemers in de huidig snel veranderende samenleving heeft de NHL Stenden Hogeschool gekozen voor een nieuw onderwijsconcept, namelijk Design Based Education (DBE). DBE is gebaseerd op het gedachtegoed van Design Thinking en stimuleert iteratieve en creatieve denkprocessen. DBE is een student-georiënteerde leeromgeving, gebaseerd op praktijk-, dialoog-, en vraaggestuurde onderwijsprincipes en op zelfsturend, constructief, contextueel en samenwerkend leren. Studenten construeren gezamenlijk kennis en ontwikkelen een prototype voor een praktijkvraagstuk. Student-georiënteerde leeromgevingen vragen andere begeleidingsstrategieën van docenten dan zij gewend zijn. Van docenten wordt verwacht dat zij studenten activeren gezamenlijk kennis te construeren en dat zij nauw samenwerken met werkveldprofessionals. Eerder onderzoek toont aan dat docenten, zelfs in een student-georiënteerde leeromgeving, geneigd zijn terug te vallen op conventionele strategieën. De overstap naar een ander onderwijsconcept gaat dus blijkbaar niet vanzelf. Collectief leren stimuleert docenten de dialoog aan te gaan met andere docenten en werkveldprofessionals met als doel gezamenlijk te experimenteren en collectief te handelen. De centrale vraag van het postdoc-onderzoek is het ontwerpen en ontwikkelen van (karakteristieken van) interventies die collectief leren van docenten en werkveldprofessionals stimuleren. Het doel van het postdoconderzoek is om de overstap naar DBE zo probleemloos mogelijk te laten verlopen door docenten te ondersteunen DBE leeromgevingen te ontwikkelen in samenwerking met werkveldprofessionals en DBE te integreren in hun docentactiviteiten. De onderzoeksmethode is Educational Design Research en bestaat uit vier fasen: preliminair onderzoek, ontwikkelen van prototypes, evaluatie en bijdrage aan de praktijk. Het onderzoek is verbonden aan het lectoraat Sustainable Educational Concepts in Higher Education en wordt hiërarchisch en inhoudelijk aangestuurd door de lector. Docenten, experts, werkveldprofessionals en studenten worden betrokken bij het onderzoek. Dit onderzoek kan zowel binnen als buiten de hogeschool een bijdrage leveren omdat steeds meer hogescholen kiezen voor een ander onderwijsconcept.
The pressure on the European health care system is increasing considerably: more elderly people and patients with chronic diseases in need of (rehabilitation) care, a diminishing work force and health care costs continuing to rise. Several measures to counteract this are proposed, such as reduction of the length of stay in hospitals or rehabilitation centres by improving interprofessional and person-centred collaboration between health and social care professionals. Although there is a lot of attention for interprofessional education and collaborative practice (IPECP), the consortium senses a gap between competence levels of future professionals and the levels needed in rehabilitation practice. Therefore, the transfer from tertiary education to practice concerning IPECP in rehabilitation is the central theme of the project. Regional bonds between higher education institutions and rehabilitation centres will be strengthened in order to align IPECP. On the one hand we deliver a set of basic and advanced modules on functioning according to the WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and a set of (assessment) tools on interprofessional skills training. Also, applications of this theory in promising approaches, both in education and in rehabilitation practice, are regionally being piloted and adapted for use in other regions. Field visits by professionals from practice to exchange experiences is included in this work package. We aim to deliver a range of learning materials, from modules on theory to guidelines on how to set up and run a student-run interprofessional learning ward in a rehabilitation centre. All tested outputs will be published on the INPRO-website and made available to be implemented in the core curricula in tertiary education and for lifelong learning in health care practice. This will ultimately contribute to improve functioning and health outcomes and quality of life of patients in rehabilitation centres and beyond.
