Deze publicatie gaat over het leiderschap van leraren, internationaal aangeduid als ‘teacher leadership’. Leraren kunnen veel verschillende vormen van leiderschap uitoefenen. Persoonlijk leiderschap heeft bijvoorbeeldbetrekking op de mate waarin leraren regie over hun eigen werk en eigen ontwikkeling voeren. Pedagogisch leiderschap is de wijze waarop leraren in hun klas leiderschap richting hun leerlingen tonen en invloed uitoefenen op de leerprocessen van leerlingen. In voorliggende publicatie bedoelen we met ‘leiderschap van leraren’ of ‘teacher leadership’ de invloed die leraren uitoefenen op zaken die hun eigen klas of hun eigen vak overstijgen. Met dat leiderschap beïnvloeden ze collega’s, leidinggevenden en anderen binnen de school. Die invloed kan betrekking hebben op het curriculum, het handelen van collega’s, het pedagogisch klimaat binnen de school, het beleid en de organisatie vanzaken binnen en buiten de school, etc. Dat kan door ideeën te opperen, te ontwikkelen, te ondersteunen, te adviseren, te inspireren, rolmodel te zijn en nog op tal van andere manieren.In Nederland wordt in toenemende mate verwacht dat leraren de verantwoordelijkheid en leiding krijgen en nemen ten aanzien van cruciale aspecten van het onderwijs binnen scholen. Leraren moeten dan wel de mogelijkheden hebben om deze rol op zich te kunnen nemen (NRO, 2017). Dit was aanleiding voor het Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek om opdracht te geven tot het schrijven van een overzichtsartikel rond de vraag:Op welke manier(en) kan bereikt worden dat leraren een leidende rol kunnen spelen in individuele scholen (in alle onderwijssectoren), in samenwerkingsverbanden tussen scholen en op landelijk niveau?Voor het beantwoorden van deze vraag zijn we uitgegaan van vier deelvragen:1. Waarom is er in toenemende mate aandacht voor teacher leadership?2. Wat is teacher leadership precies?3. Wat is er uit onderzoek bekend over de effecten van en condities voor teacherleadership?4. Welke vormen van teacher leadership zijn er in de Nederlandse context reedszichtbaar?Op basis hiervan beantwoorden we de hoofdvraag:Hoe kan het leiderschap van leraren in scholen versterkt worden?Voor het beantwoorden van deze vijf vragen hebben we geput uit nationale en internationale praktijk- en beleidspublicaties, gebruik gemaakt van diverse overzichtsstudies en een systematische analyse gedaan van 44 onderzoekspublicaties over teacher leadership die tussen 2014 en 2017 zijn verschenen.
Most nurse leadership studies have concentrated on a classical, heroic, and hierarchical view of leadership. However, critical leadership studies have argued the need for more insight into leadership in daily nursing practices. Nurses must align their professional standards and opinions on quality of care with those of other professionals, management, and patients. They want to achieve better outcomes for their patients but also feel disciplined and controlled. To deal with this, nurses challenge the status quo by showing rebel nurse leadership. In this paper, we describe 47 nurses’ experiences with rebel nurse leadership from a leadership-as-practice perspective. In eight focus groups, nurses from two hospitals and one long-term care organization shared their experiences of rebel nurse leadership practices. They illustrated the differences between “bad” and “good” rebels. Knowledge, work experience, and patient-driven motivation were considered necessary for “good” rebel leadership. The participants also explained that continuous social influencing is important while exploring and challenging the boundaries set by colleagues and management. Credibility, trust, autonomy, freedom, and preserving relationships determined whether rebel nurses acted visibly or invisibly. Ultimately, this study refines the concept of rebel nurse leadership, gives a better understanding of how this occurs in nursing practice, and give insights into the challenges faced when studying nursing leadership practices.
MULTIFILE
University teacher teams can work toward educational change through the process of team learning behavior, which involves sharing and discussing practices to create new knowledge. However, teachers do not routinely engage in learning behavior when working in such teams and it is unclear how leadership support can overcome this problem. Therefore, this study examines when team leadership behavior supports teacher teams in engaging in learning behavior. We studied 52 university teacher teams (281 respondents) involved in educational change, resulting in two key findings. First, analyses of multiple leadership types showed that team learning behavior was best supported by a shared transformational leadership style that challenges the status quo and stimulates team members’ intellect. Mutual transformational encouragement supported team learning more than the vertical leadership source or empowering and initiating structure styles of leadership. Second, moderator analyses revealed that task complexity influenced the relationship between vertical empowering team leadership behavior and team learning behavior. Specifically, this finding suggests that formal team leaders who empower teamwork only affected team learning behavior when their teams perceived that their task was not complex. These findings indicate how team learning behavior can be supported in university teacher teams responsible for working toward educational change. Moreover, these findings are unique because they originate from relating multiple team leadership types to team learning behavior, examining the influence of task complexity, and studying this in an educational setting.
This book discusses whether, and if so, how facility management (FM) can contribute toeducational achievements at Dutch higher education institutions. Although there is increasingevidence that the quality of the lecturer is decisive for the performance and development ofstudents (Marzano 2007; Mourshed, Chijioke and Barber 2010), and in addition, educationalleadership can shape the necessary boundary conditions for these primary actors to succeed,nowadays this must be considered as a too narrow conception of what good education is allabout. Up to date, in literature there is a lively debate about the effective use of facilitydesign, as a mixture of designed features of physical facilities and services, to contribute toeducation as well. We have seen many examples of the so-called human factor beingnegatively influenced by seemingly fringe events, but that suddenly appears to beprecondition for education. Too warm, too cold, too crowded, too loud, too messy, and noidea why this device doesn’t work are phrases that come to mind. We now know that the builtschool environment and facility services that are offered are among the elements that caninfluence good education. The evidence comes from a multiple disciplines, such asenvironmental-psychology (Durán-Narucki 2008; Hygge and Knez 2001), medicine(Hutchinson 2003), educational research (Blackmore et al. 2011; Oblinger 2006; Schneider2002; Temple 2007), and real estate and facility management (Daisey, Angell and Apte 2003;Duyar 2010; Barrett et al. 2013). Considering all the above, there seems to be a scientificblack box with respect to the relatively new scientific discipline of FM. Deeply rooted inpractice, the abstractions that have existed until now have hardly led to a fundamentalunderstanding of the contribution of FM to education. Therefore, the main objective of thisbook is as follows.
