Zoekresultaten

Know-Why and Design: Key differences between craft and profession, Illustrated at orthopaedic shoemaking.

Abstract 1 Im Laufe der Jahre haben die Orthopädieschuhmacher ihr Handwerk als eine Spezialisierung der traditionellen Schuhmacherei entwickelt. Im Gegensatz zu regulären Schuhmachern, die Schuhe für gesunde Füße machen, helfen Orthopädieschuhmacher Menschen mit Fußproblemen, welche ihre Mobilität behindern. Die Orthopädie-schuhmacher tun dies durch die Anpassung oder Änderung von Schuhen, je nach Schwere des Mangels des Fußes, in einem Bereich von einfachen Modifikationen der Standard-Schuhen bis zu vollständig maßgeschneiderten Schuhlösungen. In der Vergangenheit wurden die Orthopädieschuhmacher im Rahmen einer Lehre in der Berufspraxis ausgebildet. Auf diese Weise wurden berufliche Kenntnisse, Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten des Schuhmachermeisters an die Lehrlinge/Gesellen von Generation zu Generation übertragen. Diese Basiskenntnis wurde übertragen wie eine Katalog an Erfahrungswissen, zusammen gestellt aus: 1) Wissen über bekannte Probleme und 2) die dazu gehörige Lösungen. Weiterhin wurden 3) die Kenntnisse, Fähigkeiten und Erfahrungswissen formuliert und als prozedurales Wissen gelehrt, um effektive Lösungen zu entwickeln. Folge war, dass verschiedene Schuhmacher-Gruppen verschiedene Lösungen für die gleichen Probleme entwickelten, wofür jede "empirische Gültigkeit“ beanspruchte. Diese Kenntnisbasis von Orthopädieschuhmachern kann man charakterisieren als: Herstellung orientiert an impliziten, durch Tradition bestimmten Lösungsentwürfen. Da die empirischen Lösungen der Nachfrage entsprachen, waren die Begründung der Lösung und der methodische Entwurf der Orthopädieschuhe keine explizit geforderte Aktivität. Vor kurzem wurde in den Niederlanden diese traditionsbestimmte Kenntnisbasis der Orthopädieschuhmacher durch die Krankenkassen in Frage gestellt, da die Kassen wissen wollten, ob und warum ein Lösungsvorschlag wirksam wäre. Erfolgt diese Begründung nicht, wird nur die preiswerteste Lösung zurückerstattet. Die Kassen stellten die Begründungsfrage und forderten also eine akzeptable wissenschaftliche Erklärung für die Lösung des Mobilitätsproblems. Diese Erklärung ist im Prinzip erreichbar, als zum Beispiel innovative Imaging-und Messmethoden zur Verfügung stehen. Es gab großen Widerstand in den Reaktionen auf die Aufforderung, traditionelles Wissen wissenschaftlich zu begründen. Es gab abwehrende (in Zusammenhang mit den Kosten) aber auch pro-aktive / innovative Reaktionen. Fontys University of Applied Sciences nahm die innovative Perspektive und identifizierte Möglichkeiten um das Orthopädieschuhmacher-Handwerk qualitativ aufzuwerten zu einem modernen, mehr professionellen und mit wissenschaftlichen Einsichten unterstützten Beruf. Aus dieser Perspektive hat Fontys einen neuen Lehrplan gestaltet und die Schlüsselperspektiven: 1) Begründung und 2) methodischer Entwurf inkorporiert. Der Lehrplan wird die vorläufigen IVO Kriterien für eine Cat-II Akkreditierung erfüllen. Derzeit wird die Gestaltung von Lehrplänen in Vietnam als Teil der internationalen Kooperationsprojekte pilotiert. Keywords: Vom Handwerk zur Profession, Wissensarten, Methodischer Entwurf Abstract 2 Over the years, orthopaedic shoemakers developed their craft as specialisation of traditional shoemaking. In contrast of shoemakers who make shoes for the healthy feet, the orthopaedic shoemakers assist people with foot related problems causing mobility disabilities. They do this by adapting and modifying shoes in a range from simple modifications of standard shoes to complete bespoke shoe solutions depending on the severity of the deficiency of the foot. In the past, orthopaedic shoemakers were trained in a craft-apprenticeship model which was used to transfer the professional knowledge of the master shoemaker to the apprentice, from generation to generation. This transferred knowledgebase can be perceived as an catalogue of empirical knowledge consisting of 1) knowledge of known problems and 2) associate solutions (know –how). In addition, 3) the knowledge, skills, tricks and traps, formulated in procedural knowledge (do this-do that) was taught to produce the solutions. Consequently, different groups of shoemakers had different solutions for the same issues and each claimed empirical success. This orthopaedic shoemakers knowledgebase can be characterised as manufacture driven with implicit tradition based designs. As the traditional empirical solutions met the demand, explanatory knowledge and explicit methodological shoe design were no issues. In the Netherlands, recently the knowledgebase -know how- of the orthopaedic shoemakers was challenged as the insurance companies wanted to know whether and why a proposed solution is effective. If not, the cheapest solution was refunded. They requested an acceptable scientific explanation – know why- which in principle became achievable as innovative imaging- and measurement methods became available. As a result, the orthopaedic shoe branch was challenged when their mode 2 knowledge was questioned. The reactions were contrasting, from reactive(follow the money) to pro active/innovative. Fontys University of Applied Sciences took an innovative perspective and perceived possibilities to upgraded the craft of orthopaedic shoemakers into a modern, more academic, profession. Therefore, Fontys designed a new curriculum and added the key characteristic: 1) explanatory knowledge (mode 1 knowledge) and 2) methodical design. The curriculum is set up to meet the provisional IVO guidelines for a cat-II accreditation. At present, the curriculum design is piloted in Vietnam as part of international cooperation project. Keywords: from craft to profession, types of knowledge, methodical design

Measuring sustainable employability

BACKGROUND: The capability set for work questionnaire (CSWQ) is being used to measure the new model of sustainable employability building on the capability approach. However, previous studies on the psychometric properties of the instrument are limited and cross-sectional. This two-way study aimed to (1) evaluate the convergent validity of the CSWQ with the theoretically related constructs person-job fit, strengths use, and opportunity to craft and (2) test the predictive and incremental validity of the questionnaire for the well-established work outcomes, including work ability, work engagement, job satisfaction, and task performance.METHODS: A representative sample of 303 Dutch workers, chosen with probably random sampling, were surveyed using a one-month follow-up, cross-lagged design via the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel. The convergent validity was assessed by exploring the strength of associations between the capability set for work questionnaire and the theoretically related constructs using Pearson's correlations. The predictive and incremental validity was evaluated by performing a series of linear hierarchical regression analyses.RESULTS: We found evidence of the convergent validity of the capability set score by moderate correlations with person-job fit, strengths use, and opportunity to craft (r = 0.51-0.52). A series of multiple regression analyses showed that Time 1 capability set score and its constituents (i.e., importance, ability, and enablement) generally had predictive and incremental validity for work ability, work engagement, job satisfaction, and task performance measured at Time 2. However, the incremental power of the CSWQ over and above conceptually related constructs was modest.CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the convergent, predictive, and incremental validity of the capability set for work questionnaire with not previously investigated work constructs. This provided further evidence to support its utility for assessing a worker's sustainable employability for future research and practical interventions.

Crafting showing making

Literary writing on the web

‘How do we write when we write online?’ is the question asked by the first item on this list and by the list as a whole. We write a lot online; that’s for sure. Of course, there are discussions about the mobile phone destroying our sense of grammar, about image-biased media overturning the craft of writing, whether moving or not, and about whole populations no longer able to read books or, for that matter, anything over a thousand words.

New approaches for participation in digital society in distant times of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed many aspects of people’s lives, and seems to have affected people’s wellbeing and relation to technology now, and in the future. Not only has it changed people’s lives and the way citizens live, work, exercise, craft and stay connected, the pandemic has also altered the way Human Computer Interaction (HCI) professionals can engage in face-to-face interactions and consequently participatory, human-centered design and research. Limitations in being close to others and having physical, visible and shared interactions pose a challenge as these aspects are typically considered critical for the accomplishment of a transparent, attractive and critical understanding of technology and respective civic and digital engagement for wellbeing. Consequently, the risk now observed is that citizens in the new ‘normal’ digital society, particularly vulnerable groups, are beingeven less connected, supported or heard. Drawing from a study with an expert panel of 20 selected HCI related professionals in The Netherlands that participated on-line (through focus groups, questionnaires and/or interviews) discussing co-creation for wellbeing in times of COVID-19 (N=20), and civic values for conditional data sharing (N=11), this paper presents issues encountered and potential new approaches to overcome participatory challenges in the ‘new’ digital society. This study further draws on project reporting and a ‘one week in the life of’ study in times of COVID-19 with a physical toolkit for remote data collection that was used with older adults (65+, N=13) and evaluated with professionals (N=6). Drawing on such projects and professional experiences, the paper discusses some opportunities of participatory approaches for the new ‘distant’ normal.

Challenges for the Orthopaedic Shoe Profession and related research

Already for many centuries shoemaking exists as a craft. Orthopaedic shoemaking is a relative new profession that has emerged and evolved during the last century. Originated from the craft of shoemaking it has developed into a profession on the intersection between healthcare and technology. Important drivers were unity of language, developments in science and technology, but also developments in the relationship with society. Whereas in the past shoes were made for patients, today shoes are made with patients, driven by patients’ requirements. This development urges orthopaedic shoemaking to shift from shoe design to the design of mobility solutions, to adopt new ways of interdisciplinary cooperation and to innovate the manufacturing process. This offers many opportunities for research.