Inleiding Van praktijkondersteuners wordt verwacht dat zij samen met chronische zieke patiënten doelen en actieplannen formuleren. Dit vraagt een verandering van hun rol: van medisch expert naar coach. Wij onderzochten de ervaringen van praktijkondersteuners en patiënten met COACH, een nieuwe aanpak voor gezamenlijke besluitvorming, en hun mening over de implementatiemogelijkheden van deze aanpak. Methode Vijftien praktijkondersteuners in Noord-Limburg kregen een training in de nieuwe aanpak; 23 patiënten deden mee aan het onderzoek. De kwantitatieve en kwalitatieve procesevaluatie omvatte individuele interviews (n = 15), een focusgroep (n = 9) en vragenlijstonderzoek bij de praktijkondersteuners, interviews met patiënten (n = 10) en dertien audio-opnamen van een consult. Resultaten De praktijkondersteuners vonden COACH waardevol om tot persoonsgerichte doelen te komen, maar moeilijk te integreren in de bestaande werkroutines. Ze ervoeren een rolconflict ten aanzien van het medisch protocol en voelden zich daarin weinig ondersteund door de huisartsen. De helft van de geïnterviewde patiënten merkte geen verschil in de werkwijze van de praktijkondersteuner; de anderen meldden dat de praktijkondersteuner meer vragen had gesteld en dat zij meer inzicht in hun situatie hadden gekregen. Conclusie Om praktijkondersteuners daadwerkelijk te kunnen inschakelen bij gezamenlijke besluitvorming, zullen praktijkondersteuners en huisartsen samen moeten nadenken over een gezamenlijke rolopvatting.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and pretest a systematic conversation approach for nurses to tailor aftercare to oncology patient's goals, unmet needs and wishes. Methods: We used an iterative developmental process for complex interventions: 1. Identifying problems 2. Identifying overall objectives 3. Designing the intervention 4. Pretesting and adapting the intervention. Results: The main results of the problem identification were: non-systematic and incomplete screening of potential issues, caveats in providing information, and shared decision-making. The overall objective formulated was: To develop a model for aftercare conversations based on shared goal-setting and decision-making. The conversation approach consists of four phases: 1. Preparation of the consultation including a questionnaire, 2. Shared goal-setting by means of a tool visualizing domains of life, and 3. Shared care planning by means of an overview of possible choices in aftercare, a database with health care professionals and a cancer survivorship care plan. 4. Evaluation. The results of the pretest revealed that the conversation approach needs to be flexible and tailored to the patient and practice setting, and embedded in the care processes. The conversation approach was perceived as enhancing patient-centeredness and leading to more in-depth consultations. Conclusion: The conversation approach was developed in co-creation with stakeholders. The results of the pretest revealed important implications and suggestions for implementation in routine care. The aftercare conversation approach can be used by nurses to provide tailored patient-centered evidence-based aftercare. Tailored aftercare should support oncology patient's goals, unmet needs and wishes. Further tailoring is needed.
Athlete development depends on many factors that need to be balanced by the coach. The amount of data collected grows with the development of sensor technology. To make data-informed decisions for training prescription of their athletes, coaches could be supported by feedback through a coach dashboard. The aim of this paper is to describe the design of a coach dashboard based on scientific knowledge, user requirements, and (sensor) data to support decision making of coaches for athlete development in cyclic sports. The design process involved collaboration with coaches, embedded scientists, researchers, and IT professionals. A classic design thinking process was used to structure the research activities in five phases: empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test phases. To understand the user requirements of coaches, a survey (n = 38), interviews (n = 8) and focus-group sessions (n = 4) were held. Design principles were adopted into mock-ups, prototypes, and the final coach dashboard. Designing a coach dashboard using the co-operative research design helped to gain deep insights into the specific user requirements of coaches in their daily training practice. Integrating these requirements, scientific knowledge, and functionalities in the final coach dashboard allows the coach to make data-informed decisions on training prescription and optimise athlete development.
