Biogas plays an important role in many future renewable energy scenarios as a source of storable and easily extracted form of renewable energy. However, there remains uncertainty as to which sources of biomass can provide a net energy gain while being harvested in a sustainable, ecologically friendly manner. This study will focus on the utilization of common, naturally occurring grass species which are cut during landscape management and typically treated as a waste stream. This waste grass can be valorized through co-digestion with cow manure in a biogas production process. Through the construction of a biogas production model based on the methodology proposed by (Pierie, Moll, van Gemert, & Benders, 2012), a life cycle analysis (LCA) has been performed which determines the impacts and viability of using common grass in a digester to produce biogas. This model performs a material and energy flow analysis (MEFA) on the biogas production process and tracks several system indicators (or impact factors), including the process energy return on energy investment ((P)EROI), the ecological impact (measured in Eco Points), and the global warming potential (GWP, measured in terms of kg of CO2 equivalent). A case study was performed for the village of Hoogkerk in the north-east Netherlands, to determine the viability of producing a portion of the village’s energy requirements by biogas production using biomass waste streams (i.e. common grass and cow manure in a co-digestion process). This study concludes that biogas production from common grass can be an effective and sustainable source of energy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and negative environmental impacts when compared to alternate methods of energy production, such as biogas produced from maize and natural gas production.
This study evaluated the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) in both batch and continuous digesters at 37 °C. Synergistic effects of co-digesting CM and SM at varying volatile solids (VS) ratios (1:0, 0:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3) were observed in the batch experiment, with the most effective degradation of cellulose (56%) and hemicellulose (55%), and thus, the highest cumulative methane yield (210 mL/gVSadded) obtained at a CM:SM ratio of 1:3. Co-digesting CM and SM improved the hydrolysis, as evidenced by the cellulase brought by SM and the increases of cellulolytic bacteria Clostridium. Besides, co-digestion enhanced the acidogenesis and methanogenesis, reflected by the enrichment of syntrophic bacteria Candidatus Cloacimonas and hydrogenotrophic archaea Methanoculleus (Coenzyme-B sulfoethylthiotransferase). When testing continuous digestion, the methane yield increased from 146 mL/gVS/d (CM alone) to 179 mL/gVS/d (CM:SM at 1:1) at a constant organic loading rate (OLR) of 1g VS/L/d and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 25 days. Furthermore, the anaerobic digestion process was enhanced when the daily feed changed back to CM alone, reflected by the improved daily methane yield (159 mL/VS/d). These results provided insights into the improvement of methane production during the anaerobic digestion of animal manure.
LINK
Decentralized biogas produced through co-digestion of biomass can play an important role in our future renewable energy mix. However the optimal design, planning and use of a biogas production chain is a daunting process. When looking into a biogas production chain one must take into account, first, the biomass availability in quantity, quality and the location, second, the energy demand in energy type, quantity and location and finally the needed machinery and infrastructure to connect them. During this process there are social, legal and environmental issues to overcome, but overall the financial aspects will mostly dictate viability. Hence, the complexity involved in linking the aforementioned aspects is difficult at most.
