Dienst van SURF
© 2025 SURF
This article describes a European project which was aimed at improving the situation of persons with psychiatric or learning disabilities with regard to social participation and citizenship. The project took place in three countries (Estonia, Hungary and the Netherlands) and four cities (Tallinn, Budapest, Amersfoort and Maastricht). The project included research and actions at the policy level, the organizational level and the practice level. At the policy level, the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006) and the European Disability Strategy (European Commission, 2010) were used to look at national and local policies, at the reality of the lives of those with disabilities and at the support that professional services offer with regard to participation and inclusion. The project generated a number of insights, recommendations and methods by which to improve the quality of services and increase the number of opportunities for community engagement. In this article, we present some of the lessons learned from the meta-analysis. Although the circumstances in each country are quite different with regard to policy, culture and service systems, it is remarkable that people with disabilities face many of the same problems. The study shows that in all three countries, access to services could be improved. Barriers include bureaucratic procedures and a lack of services. The research identified that in every country and city there are considerable barriers regarding equal participation in the field of housing, work and leisure activities. In addition to financial barriers, there are the barriers of stigma and self-stigmatization. Marginalization keeps people in an unequal position and hinders their recovery and participation. In all countries, professionals need to develop a stronger focus on supporting the participation of their clients in public life and in the development of different roles pertaining to citizenship
In dit document nemen we de lezer mee op onze ontdekkingstocht naar empowerment projecten voor thuisloze en ongedocumenteerde jongeren in een grootstedelijk gebied.
In this thesis several studies are presented that have targeted decision making about case management plans in probation. In a case management plan probation officers describe the goals and interventions that should help offenders stop reoffending, and the specific measures necessary to reduce acute risks of recidivism and harm. Such a plan is embedded in a judicial framework, a sanction or advice about the sanction in which these interventions and measures should be executed. The topic of this thesis is the use of structured decision support, and the question is if this can improve decision making about case management plans in probation and subsequently improve the effectiveness of offender supervision. In this chapter we first sketch why structured decision making was introduced in the Dutch probation services. Next we describe the instrument for risk and needs assessment as well as the procedure to develop case management plans that are used by the Dutch probation services and that are investigated in this thesis. Then we describe the setting of the studies and the research questions, and we conclude with an overview of this thesis.
ALE organised an event with Parktheater Eindhoven and LSA-citizens (the Dutch umbrella organisation for active citizens). Five ALE students from the minor Imagineering and business/social innovation took responsibility for concept and actual organisation. On Jan 18th, they were supported by six other group members of the minor as volunteers. An IMEM-team of 5 students gathered materials for a video that can support the follow-up actions of the organisers. The students planned to deliver their final product on February 9th. The theatre will critically assess the result and compare it to the products often realised by students from different schools or even professional ones, like Veldkamp productions. Time will tell whether future opportunities will come up for IMEM. The collaboration of ALE and IMEM students is possible and adding value to the project.More than 180 visitors showed interest in the efforts of 30 national and local citizen initiatives presenting themselves on the market square in the theatre and the diverse speakers during the plenary session. The students created a great atmosphere using the qualities of the physical space and the hospitality of the theatre. Chair of the day, Roland Kleve, kicked off and invited a diverse group of people to the stage: Giel Pastoor, director of the theatre, used the opportunity to share his thoughts on the shifting role of theatre in our dynamic society. Petra Ligtenberg, senior project manager SDG NL https://www.sdgnederland.nl/sdgs/ gave insights to the objectives and progress of the Netherlands. Elly Rijnierse, city maker and entrepreneur from Den Haag, presented her intriguing efforts in her own neighbourhood in the city to create at once both practical and social impacts on SDG 11 (sustainable city; subgoal 3.2). Then the alderman Marcel Oosterveer informed the visitors about Eindhoven’s efforts on SDGs. The plenary ended with very personal interviews of representatives of two impressive citizen initiatives (Parkinson to beat; Stichting Ik Wil). In the two workshop rounds, ALE took responsibility for two workshops. Firstly the workshop: Beyond SDG cherrypicking: using the Economy for the common good’, in cooperation with citizen initiative Ware winst Brabant en Parktheater (including Social innovation-intern Jasper Box), secondly a panel dialogue on local partnerships (SDG 17) for the sustainable city (SDG 11) addressing inclusion (SDG 10) and the livability (SDG 3) with 11 representatives from local/provincial government, companies, third sector and, of course: citizen initiatives.
In dit project ontwikkelen we Herstelcirkel ++, een gezondheidscoöperatie voor mensen met (risico op) leefstijlgerelateerde aandoeningen (o.a. diabetes). Coöperatie definiëren wij open als een (maatschappelijke) onderneming of autonome organisatie waarbij de deelnemers zeggenschap hebben over hoe zij voorzien in hun behoeften door het realiseren of beheren van voorzieningen en/of diensten. Deze ontwikkeling beantwoordt de wens van mensen met leefstijlaandoeningen (meer regie over de eigen gezondheid) en de door professionals gevoelde noodzaak om de eerstelijnszorg toegankelijk te houden. Het uitgangspunt is dat zorg en gezondheidsbevordering zoveel mogelijk rond, door en voor mensen met vergelijkbare wensen georganiseerd kan worden, in de eigen omgeving zodat de stap naar formele zorg minder nodig is. Complementair aan formele zorg en duurzaam verankerd in een wijklandschap van gezondheidsbevordering. Ondanks Nederlandse burgerinitiatieven rond zorg en gezondheid ontstaan coöperatieve vormen van zelfhulp niet altijd en overal, vooral niet in stadswijken (met achterstandsproblematiek). Hoe kunnen professionals die in de wijk actief zijn rond zorg, gezondheid en welzijn en MKB-bedrijven die zoeken naar innovatieve dienstverlening m.b.t. voeding, beweging en coaching samen met bewoners meer coöperatieve samenwerking bewerkstelligen ten behoeve van vitaliteit? Centraal in dit project staat de doorontwikkeling van Herstelcirkel in de wijk (HCIW) een sociale innovatie die diabetes-zelfmanagementeducatie en zelfhulp combineert door groepen mensen onder begeleiding van coaching aan leefstijlverandering te laten werken. Ondanks veelbelovende resultaten na het eenjarige traject, blijkt voor het merendeel het effect niet duurzaam. Uitgangspunten project: Co-designaanpak die professionals leert kennismaken met ontwerpgerichte methoden om met en voor bewoners passende dienstverlening in de wijk te ontwikkelen die coöperatieve zelfhulp faciliteren. Versterken van positieve krachten van bewoners en wijken (‘assets’) als elementen van de sociale en fysieke leefomgeving die deelnemers in staat stellen gezondheid te bevorderen. Ontwikkeling van een coöperatie, inclusief organisatorische aspecten: samenwerking met gezondheids- en welzijnsprofessionals en duurzame verankering in de wijk.
Traffic accidents are a severe public health problem worldwide, accounting for approximately 1.35 million deaths annually. Besides the loss of life, the social costs (accidents, congestion, and environmental damage) are significant. In the Netherlands, in 2018, these social costs were approximately € 28 billion, in which traffic accidents alone accounted for € 17 billion. Experts believe that Automated Driving Systems (ADS) can significantly reduce these traffic fatalities and injuries. For this reason, the European Union mandates several ADS in new vehicles from 2022 onwards. However, the utility of ADS still proves to present difficulties, and their acceptance among drivers is generally low.As of now, ADS only supports drivers within their pre-defined safety and comfort margins without considering individual drivers’ preferences, limiting ADS in behaving and interacting naturally with drivers and other road users. Thereby, drivers are susceptible to distraction (when out-of-the-loop), cannot monitor the traffic environment nor supervise the ADS adequately. These aspects induce the gap between drivers and ADS, raising doubts about ADS’ usefulness among drivers and, subsequently, affecting ADS acceptance and usage by drivers.To resolve this issue, the HUBRIS Phase-2 consortium of expert academic and industry partners aims at developing a self-learning high-level control system, namely, Human Counterpart, to bridge the gap between drivers and ADS. The central research question of this research is:How to develop and demonstrate a human counterpart system that can enable socially responsible human-like behaviour for automated driving systems?HUBRIS Phase-2 will result in the development of the human counterpart system to improve the trust and acceptance of drivers regarding ADS. In this RAAK-PRO project, the development of this system is validated in two use-cases:I. Highway: non-professional drivers;II. Distribution Centre: professional drivers.Collaborative partners:Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Bricklog B.V., Goudappel B.V., HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V., Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Rijkswaterstaat, Saxion, Sencure B.V., Siemens Industry Software Netherlands B.V., Smits Opleidingen B.V., Stichting Innovatiecentrum Verkeer en Logistiek, TNO Den Haag, TU Delft, University of Twente, V-Tron B.V., XL Businesspark Twente.