Little is known about the role of organizational culture regarding management control systems (MCS) that focus on corporate sustainability. To enhance our understanding of this phenomenon, this study of MCS shows how social and technical forms of control can be used to embedded sustainability in the corporate culture. When companies are founded with a sustainable purpose, then sustainability at the core of their endeavors. In these cases, social controls have the main focus and have a substitutive role to technical controls. In contrast, social and technical controls are complementary to effectively embed sustainability in the culture for companies transitioning to sustainability. We empirically inform our study with a multiple exploratory case-study design, using interviews, desk research, and observations, investigating a variety of twenty companies in The Netherlands that aim to corporate sustainability. In this paper, we respond to the need in a literature for further empirical research regarding the design of MCS aimed at sustainability, and the role of culture in particular. We also contribute to the discussion in the literature about complementarity versus substitution of controls. Besides contributing to the academic literature, we believe this paper can also help practitioners design MCS to create sustainable value for their organization.
This paper investigates how management accounting and control systems (operationalized by using Simons’ (1995a) levers of control framework) can be used as devices to support public value creation and as such it contributes to the literature on public value accounting. Using a mixed methods case study approach, including documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, we found diverging uses of control systems in the Dutch university of applied sciences we investigated. While belief and interactive control systems are used intensively for strategy change and implementation, diagnostic controls were used mainly at the decentral level and seen as devices to make sure that operational and financial boundaries were not crossed. Therefore, belief and interactive control systems lay the foundation for the implementation of a new strategy, in which concepts of public value play a large role, using diagnostic controls to constrain actions at the operational level. We also found that whereas the institution wanted to have interaction with the external stakeholders, in daily practice this takes place only at the phase of strategy formulation, but not in the phase of intermediate strategy evaluation.
MULTIFILE
