Background: In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in provider-initiated HIV testing, but opportunities for timely diagnosis are regularly missed. We implemented an educational intervention to improve HIV testing by GPs from 2015 to 2020, and observed a 7% increase in testing in an evaluation using laboratory data. The objective for the current study was to gain a deeper understanding of whether and how practices and perceptions of GPs’ HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing behaviour changed following the intervention. Methods: We performed a mixed-methods study using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to assess self-reported changes in HIV/STI testing by participating GPs. Questionnaires were completed by participants at the end of the final educational sessions from 2017 through 2020, and participating GPs were interviewed from January through March 2020. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively, and open question responses were categorised thematically. Interview data were analysed following thematic analysis methods. Results: In total, 101/103 participants completed questionnaires. Of 65 participants that were included in analyses on the self-reported effect of the programme, forty-seven (72%) reported it had changed their HIV/STI testing, including improved STI consultations, adherence to the STI consultation guideline, more proactive HIV testing, and more extragenital STI testing. Patients’ risk factors, patients’ requests and costs were most important in selecting STI tests ordered. Eight participants were interviewed and 15 themes on improved testing were identified, including improved HIV risk-assessment, more proactive testing for HIV/STI, more focus on HIV indicator conditions and extragenital STI testing, and tools to address HIV during consultations. However, several persistent barriers for optimal HIV/STI testing by GPs were identified, including HIV-related stigma and low perceived risk. Conclusions: Most GPs reported improved HIV/STI knowledge, attitude and testing, but there was a discrepancy between reported changes in HIV testing and observed increases using laboratory data. Our findings highlight challenges in implementation of effective interventions, and in their evaluation. Lessons learned from this intervention may inform follow-up initiatives to keep GPs actively engaged in HIV testing and care, on our way to zero new HIV infections.
Background In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in HIV testing. However, the proportion of people diagnosed with late-stage HIV remains high, and opportunities for earlier diagnosis are being missed. We implemented an educational intervention to improve HIV and STI testing in primary care in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Methods GPs were invited to participate in an educational program between 2015 and 2020, which included repeat sessions using audit and feedback and quality improvement plans. Data on HIV, chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing by GPs were collected from 2011 through 2020. The primary outcome was HIV testing frequency, which was compared between GPs before and after participation using Poisson regression. Secondary outcomes were chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing frequencies, and positive test proportions. Additional analyses stratified by patient sex and age were done. Findings GPs after participation performed 7% more HIV tests compared to GPs before participation (adjusted relative ratio [aRR] 1.07, 95%CI 1.04–1.09); there was no change in the proportion HIV positive tests (aRR 0.87, 95%CI 0.63–1.19). HIV testing increased most among patients who were female and ≤19 or 50–64 years old. After participation, HIV testing continued to increase (aRR 1.02 per quarter, 95%CI 1.01–1.02). Chlamydia testing by GPs after participation increased by 6% (aRR 1.06, 95%CI 1.05–1.08), while gonorrhoea testing decreased by 2% (aRR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97–0.99). We observed increases specifically in extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing. Conclusions The intervention was associated with a modest increase in HIV testing among GPs after participation, while the proportion positive HIV tests remained stable. Our results suggest that the intervention yielded a sustained effect.
In het werkveld van Life Sciences & Chemistry heeft Innovative testing te maken met het testen van stoffen op hun werking en veiligheid. Met stoffen wordt hier bedoeld alle mogelijke chemicaliën waar aan we blootgesteld worden, zoals chemicaliën in onze leef- en werkomgeving, medicijnen (inclusief biologicals), maar ook stoffen in de voeding (inclusief voedselbestanddelen en natuurlijke stoffen). Mijn les zal echter voornamelijk gaan over de laatste twee categorieën, medicijnen en stoffen in de voeding. Ik wil in mijn openbare les eerst uiteenzetten waarom het zo belangrijk is om vast te stellen wat de werking en veiligheid van stoffen is. Vervolgens wil ik beschrijven welke innovaties op dit moment al plaatsvinden, in de toxicologie en de farmacologie. Dit wil ik doen om aan te geven waar de parallellen en mogelijkheden voor synergie liggen. Daarna zal ik aan de hand van een aantal voorbeelden aangeven tegen welke grenzen men zoal aanloopt bij het testen van werking en veiligheid van stoffen, om daarbij ook aan te geven dat er duidelijk aanwijzingen zijn voor het vervagen van grenzen tussen farmacologie en toxicologie. Tot slot zal ik aangeven welke rol het Kenniscentrum Life Sciences & Chemistry van Hogeschool Utrecht op het gebied van onderzoek én onderwijs in het werkveld van Innovative testing in Life Sciences & Chemistry wil gaan spelen.
