Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop practical recommendations for physiotherapy for survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus study was performed. A scoping literature review formed the basis for three Delphi rounds. The first round was used to gather input from the panel to finalize the survey for the next two rounds in which the panel was asked to rank each of the statements on an ordinal scale with the objective to reach consensus. Consensus was defined as a SIQR of ≤ 0.5. Ten Dutch panelists participated in this study: three primary care physiotherapists, four intensive care physiotherapists, one occupational therapist, one ICU-nurse and one former ICU-patient. All involved professionals have treated survivors of critical illness. Our study was performed in parallel with an international Delphi study with hospital-based health-care professionals and researchers. Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 95.5% of the statements. This resulted in practical recommendations for physiotherapy for critical illness survivors in the primary care setting. The panel agreed that the handover should include information on 14 items. Physiotherapy treatment goals should be directed toward improvement of aerobic capacity, physical functioning, activities in daily living, muscle strength, respiratory and pulmonary function, fatigue, pain, and health-related quality of life. Physiotherapy measurements and interventions to improve these outcomes are suggested. Conclusion: This study adds to the knowledge on post-ICU physiotherapy with practical recommendations supporting clinical decision-making in the treatment of survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge.
Rationale: In order to target rehabilitation needs of survivors of critical illness and their relatives timely and adequately, a thorough needs assessment is recommended when hospital discharge planning is initiated. In light of existing evidence on physical and psychological consequences of critical illness for both patient and family, it is as yet unclear if current hospital discharge procedures suffice to meet the needs of this group. Objectives: To explore hospital discharge experience and to identify perceived barriers and enablers for a positive transition experience from hospital to home or rehabilitation facility as perceived by survivors of critical illness and their families. Methods: We performed a grounded theory study with semi-structured interviews among a group of survivors of critical illness and their relatives (N=35) discharged from 16 hospitals across the Netherlands. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using constant comparative methods, initial and focused coding was applied to the data, which were further labeled into major and subcategories, ultimately leading to the identification of key concepts. Triangulation was applied through several reflexivity meetings at different stages of the study. Results: Twenty-two former ICU patients and 13 relatives were interviewed. The mean age was 53 (SD ± 11.2) and 60% were female. Median ICU and hospital length of stay were 14 days (IQR 9.75-24.5) and 35 days (IQR 21.75-57.25) respectively. Thematic analyses led to identification of seven key concepts, representing barriers and enablers to a positive transition experience. 'Existing in a fragmented reality', 'being overlooked' and 'feeling disqualified', were identified barriers and 'feeling empowered', 'encountering empathic and expert professionals', 'managing recovery expectations' and 'family engagement' were identified as enablers for a positive perceived transition experience. Conclusions: Findings of this study suggest that current hospital discharge practice for survivors of critical illness is driven by speed and efficiency, rather than by individual needs assessments, despite advocacies for patient- and family centered care. Discharge strategies should be customized to facilitate adequate and comprehensive assessment of aftercare needs, conducted at the right time and within the right context, encouraging empowerment and a positive perceived transition from hospital to home.
BACKGROUND: The study objective was to obtain consensus on physical therapy (PT) in the rehabilitation of critical illness survivors after hospital discharge. Research questions were: what are PT goals, what are recommended measurement tools, and what constitutes an optimal PT intervention for survivors of critical illness?METHODS: A Delphi consensus study was conducted. Panelists were included based on relevant fields of expertise, years of clinical experience, and publication record. A literature review determined five themes, forming the basis for Delphi round one, which was aimed at generating ideas. Statements were drafted and ranked on a 5-point Likert scale in two additional rounds with the objective to reach consensus. Results were expressed as median and semi-interquartile range, with the consensus threshold set at ≤0.5.RESULTS: Ten internationally established researchers and clinicians participated in this Delphi panel, with a response rate of 80 %, 100 %, and 100 % across three rounds. Consensus was reached on 88.5 % of the statements, resulting in a framework for PT after hospital discharge. Essential handover information should include information on 15 parameters. A core set of outcomes should test exercise capacity, skeletal muscle strength, function in activities of daily living, mobility, quality of life, and pain. PT interventions should include functional exercises, circuit and endurance training, strengthening exercises for limb and respiratory muscles, education on recovery, and a nutritional component. Screening tools to identify impairments in other health domains and referral to specialists are proposed.CONCLUSIONS: A consensus-based framework for optimal PT after hospital discharge is proposed. Future research should focus on feasibility testing of this framework, developing risk stratification tools and validating core outcome measures for ICU survivors.
Manual labour is an important cornerstone in manufacturing and considering human factors and ergonomics is a crucial field of action from both social and economic perspective. Diverse approaches are available in research and practice, ranging from guidelines, ergonomic assessment sheets over to digitally supported workplace design or hardware oriented support technologies like exoskeletons. However, in the end those technologies, methods and tools put the working task in focus and just aim to make manufacturing “less bad” with reducing ergonomic loads as much as possible. The proposed project “Human Centered Smart Factories: design for wellbeing for future manufacturing” wants to overcome this conventional paradigm and considers a more proactive and future oriented perspective. The underlying vision of the project is a workplace design for wellbeing that makes labor intensive manufacturing not just less bad but aims to provide positive contributions to physiological and mental health of workers. This shall be achieved through a human centered technology approach and utilizing advanced opportunities of smart industry technologies and methods within a cyber physical system setup. Finally, the goal is to develop smart, shape-changing workstations that self-adapt to the unique and personal, physical and cognitive needs of a worker. The workstations are responsive, they interact in real time, and promote dynamic activities and varying physical exertion through understanding the context of work. Consequently, the project follows a clear interdisciplinary approach and brings together disciplines like production engineering, human interaction design, creative design techniques and social impact assessment. Developments take place in an industrial scale test bed at the University of Twente but also within an industrial manufacturing factory. Through the human centered design of adaptive workplaces, the project contributes to a more inclusive and healthier society. This has also positive effects from both national (e.g. relieve of health system) as well as individual company perspective (e.g. less costs due to worker illness, higher motivation and productivity). Even more, the proposal offers new business opportunities through selling products and/or services related to the developed approach. To tap those potentials, an appropriate utilization of the results is a key concern . The involved manufacturing company van Raam will be the prototypical implementation partner and serve as critical proof of concept partner. Given their openness, connections and broad range of processes they are also an ideal role model for further manufacturing companies. ErgoS and Ergo Design are involved as methodological/technological partners that deal with industrial engineering and ergonomic design of workplace on a daily base. Thus, they are crucial to critically reflect wider applicability and innovativeness of the developed solutions. Both companies also serve as multiplicator while utilizing promising technologies and methods in their work. Universities and universities of applied sciences utilize results through scientific publications and as base for further research. They also ensure the transfer to education as an important leverage to inspire and train future engineers towards wellbeing design of workplaces.
HET 'POST INTENSIVE CARE SYNDROOM'; LANGDURIGE GEVOLGEN VAN EEN INTENSIVE CARE OPNAME Dankzij verbeteringen in de zorg overleven steeds meer patiënten de behandeling op een intensive care (IC). Keerzijde hiervan zijn de lichamelijke en mentale klachten (Post Intensive Care Syndroom - PICS) waarvoor patiënten vaak langdurige revalidatie nodig hebben i.v.m. verminderde belastbaarheid en vermoeidheid. Tijdens de Covid-19 pandemie blijkt dat relatief veel IC-patiënten een migratieachtergrond en/of lage sociaaleconomische status hebben en dat een grote groep geen nazorg ontvangt. E-HEALTH ALS ONDERSTEUNING VAN DE ZORGVERLENER: HOE ZET JE HET IN? Om de Juiste Zorg op de Juiste Plek te geven wordt eHealth met coaching en telemonitoring steeds vaker ingezet bij revalidatie in de thuissituatie. Atris is een voorbeeld van een toepassing waarbij via sensoren het activiteitenniveau en hartslag gemeten worden. Atris is een veelbelovende toepassing voor patiënten met PICS maar fysiotherapeuten hebben nog beperkt ervaring met het integreren van eHealth in de behandelaanpak en beschikken over onvoldoende kennis en vaardigheden om de applicaties optimaal in te zetten en zorg op afstand te verlenen. E-HEALTH ALS ONDERSTEUNING VAN DE PATIËNT: JUISTE ZORG OP DE JUISTE PLEK VOOR IEDEREEN? eHealth applicaties dienen de zelfredzaamheid, zelfstandigheid en eigen regie van patiënten te bevorderen. Bij patiënten die thuis herstellen na een IC opname kan eHealth door gebruik van continue monitoring van vitale parameters, patiënten ondersteunen door het gevoel van veiligheid te vergroten en inzicht te verschaffen in belasting en belastbaarheid. Echter, bestaande applicaties zijn momenteel niet voor iedereen toegankelijk zoals mensen met een migratieachtergrond of beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden. Het doel van het Lifeline project is om, in een consortium met professionals vanuit de technologie, revalidatie en maatschappelijke organisaties, de bestaande Atris applicatie door te ontwikkelen richting een slimme, gebruiksvriendelijke en toegankelijke app en toe te passen in de fysiotherapeutische behandeling van patiënten met PICS.
