“Early warning signs of aggression” refers to recurring changes in behaviors, thoughts, perceptions, and feelings of the patient that are considered to be precursors of aggressive behavior. The early recognition of these signs offers possibilities for early intervention and prevention of aggressive behaviors in forensic patients. The Forensic Early warning Signs of Aggression Inventory (FESAI) was developed to assist nurses and patients in identifying and monitoring these early warning signs of aggression.
Aims: To gain a deeper understanding of the differences in patients and staff per‐spectives in response to aggression and to explore recommendations on prevention.Design: Qualitative, grounded theory study.Methods: We conducted semi‐structured interviews with patients and nurses in‐volved in an aggressive incident. Data collection was performed from May 2016 ‐March 2017.Results: Thirty‐one interviews were conducted concerning 15 aggressive incidents.Patients and nurses generally showed agreement on the factual course of events,there was variation in agreement on the perceived severity (PS). Patients' recom‐mendations on prevention were mostly personally focussed, while nurses suggested general improvements.Conclusion: Patients are often capable to evaluate aggression and give recom‐mendations on prevention shortly after the incident. Patients and nurses differ inthe PS of aggression. Recommendations on prevention of patients and nurses arecomplementary.Impact: What problem did the study address? Perspectives of patients and nursesdiffer with respect to aggression, but how is unclear. What were the main findings?Patients and nurses generally described a similar factual course of events concern‐ing the incident, patients often perceive the severity less than nurses. Patients arecapable to give recommendations on prevention of aggressive incidents, shortly after the incident. Where and on whom will the research have impact? Factual course of events can be a common ground to start evaluating aggressive incidents and post‐incident review should address the severity of incidents. Asking recommendations
Background: The target group of this study concerns young people with a mild intellectual disability. The central research question is: What evidence can be found in the literature for common and specific factors for a play therapy intervention for young people with a mild intellectual disability struggling with aggression regulation. Method: The criteria used for selecting articles are presented according to the PRISMA, and the PRISMA guidelines for writing a review have been applied. Results: Common factors have been found in the literature that relate to the relationship between therapist and client and the therapeutic skills of the play therapist. Clues have also been found for specific factors of play therapy, such as the use of play as a language and a connection with the child's inner world. In addition, certain factors have been found that are specific to the target group of this article. The non-verbal element of play therapy is an active part of this.
